Showing posts with label standards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label standards. Show all posts

Thursday, October 2, 2014

What Will It Take To Win This Job? Part 1

Week of September 29, 2014
How many times have you heard (or thought) "What do I have to do to work on this project? This would be so cool!" And where does that conversation go? Into the weeds, as I like to say. That is, into the details about the project, the technical "coolness" of it, and the possible solutions.

My job at that point is to say, "We wouldn't be talking about this opportunity if you couldn't DO the work. What we have to do now is WIN the work." I'm such a buzz kill. But it's true. Why torture yourself with the fun talk about the project when you don't even have it, yet?

I think it is because folks believe that it is hard and not fun to do what is necessary to win the work. Let me tell you what "hard and not fun" is:

Hard and Not Fun

  • Writing a persuasive cover letter without knowing what is motivating the client
  • Tailoring resumes without knowing what skills the client is looking for or what is needed for the project
  • Putting forth a passionate, believable, likable PM that has never met the client face-to-face
  • Creating a team of subconsultants without knowing if any of them have history with the client (you know what I mean)
  • Knowing that our competition did all the previous phases of work, but not knowing if the client liked it or not
  • Writing an approach for a project that you understand technically, but not politically


Easy and Fun

  • Knowing more than any of your competitors about the project
  • Knowing what the client is really after because they told you
  • Being told by the client which subconsultants they think are needed for the project
  • Getting confirmation from several stakeholders that a specific issue is a real issue for the success of the project
  • Learning that your competition did not even bother to submit a proposal because they heard how prepared you were
  • Or even better - the client asks if they can sole-source the first phase of the project because they are so impressed with what you know and how involved you have been to this point!

What will it take to get to "easy and fun" and win the job? Do this ONE THING: Write an executive summary to your proposal before the RFP is ever released.

Organize your summary like this:

  1. Client Needs - spell out what the client needs and the client's key issues or problems, based on what the client has told you
  2. Results/Benefits - what the client wants to achieve by addressing their issues or solving their problems. These could also be the benefits the client will realize through the completion of the project, such as safer streets, fewer community complaints, good publicity, etc. This must be based on what the client has told you, too.
  3. Solution(s) - what will you DO that will (lead to) the solution for the client's problems and deliver the results the client wants? This has to be action-oriented, explaining the process, not the products. The products will be the same for every competitor. Only the process, the experience the client will have working with you, will be different. Pick out the high points, as if you are opening the "black box" of your creative process.
  4. Proof - briefly explain where you/your company has provided a similar solution/process, and how it was received. This can be as brief as a single sentence: "We implemented a similar collaborative process for the City of Wonder, and they were able to complete their project three months ahead of schedule with full Council approval and an overflowing community ribbon-cutting ceremony."


Have someone else read your summary. Ask them to look for:

  • Client Focus - does the writing focus on the client, the client's needs, how the client will benefit, how the solution(s) will help, etc.? This is good. If it strays to language about you/your company before the last paragraph, it will need to be corrected.
  • Filler - words like unique, state-of-the-art, cutting-edge, innovative, and others that are vague and/or superlative. These will need to be eliminated.
  • Jargon - The executive summary needs to be clean and simple so that anyone with a fourth grade reading ability can grasp what you are saying. Look for acronyms, technical jargon, etc.
  • Pretense - words and sentences that are more complicated than they need to be to convey the message need to be cleaned up. Remember, fourth grade reading ability. Do not hide your message in complex sentence structures or difficult vocabulary.


If the writing is clear, clean, and client-focused, you're in great shape! You know enough to make the proposal process much easier and more fun. If not... Come back next week for my tips on what you need to do next.

Friday, August 22, 2014

Writing Guidelines

Welcome to the inaugural post of my BD and Marketing Blog for Professional Marketing Services. Consider this a "note from a friend." Each week, I'll post articles that interesting, informative, or important to your jobs. I will also take you behind the curtain of marketing/BD for professional services, to keep you educated and motivated in your client relations. And I will try to give you a glimpse inside my brain at the odd and sometimes amazing connections that are made there. [You don't have to be crazy to love marketing, but it helps!]

So, "Hi!" to everyone. Drop me a line sometime to let me know how you are doing, what you need, and what you are up to. The Blog is for YOU - please help me give you what you need/want to see. Until then, here are the Things You Need to Know for this week.

Just as you all have to follow standards and guidelines in submitting your deliverables to various clients and agencies, marketing and BD has standards and guidelines. Most companies have writing, style, and graphics guidelines specific to their company, or have adopted a particular edition of the AP Style guide. In either case, get to know your company's practices. Following them not only makes editing easier, it gives a consistency to your company's materials that clients recognize and appreciate.

Here are a couple of items that tend to trip us up:

Capitalization - avoid unnecessary capitals. Proper names and formal titles are capitalized when used as the name and title; almost everything else is not. If someone served as the project manager, then it is not capitalized. If they are Project Manager Jane Smith, then it is capitalized. In the case of reports, an environmental assessment is not capitalized, but the Lower Stanton River Environmental Assessment is capitalized, as it is the formal title of the report.

Acronyms - Acronyms and abbreviations for government agencies should be spelled out the first time they are used in the document. Several companies use ONLY the acronym in their employees' resumes and the project descriptions, because it is likely that the acronym would be used (and spelled out) MUCH earlier in a proposal document than the resumes/projects. This is a time-saving practice!

In the case of technologies that are widely recognized by their abbreviation, use that in all references: GPS, GIS, CADD, JPEG, PDF, etc.

Agencies commonly known by their acronym can be used with or without first spelling them out (FEMA, NOAA, EPA, DoD, etc.) These could be regional, as well, such as CDOT in Colorado -- you would not need to spell out CDOT in a CDOT submittal.

Numbers and dimensions/units - Spell out numbers under 10... except as part of dimensions, distances, or addresses. For example, "He has more than six years of experience..." but "he built a 16-by-9-inch box." All unites are spelled out (inches, feet, foot-long, percent, etc.), without the use of symbols (no ", ', or %). If the number begins a sentence, spell it out.

Ensure/Assure/Insure - these words, and all of their forms, are liability words that should be avoided. They implay a guarantee of action or result, which you might not fully control. Rewriting the sentence that has any of these words in it usually involves identifying an action or desired result and focusing on that. For example, "We will perform quality checks prior to each submittal to ensure they comply with ODOT standards," would become "We will perform quality checks to confirm compliance with ODOT standards." Or better: "We will check that deliverables comply with ODOT standards."


What are your common standards/guidelines? Or pet peeves?

Make it a great week!